[z3-five] Re: Fix for __bobo_traverse__ definition

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On 10/5/05, Florian Schulze <florian.proff.schulze at gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>>+    def __bobo_traverse__(self, REQUEST, name, RESPONSE=None):
> 
> 
> ??
> I just grepped through Zope 2. There is not one single bobo traverse
> who has a RESPONSE attribute. Zope 2 does not give a RESPONSE
> attribute when __bobo_traverse__ is called. I don't see why there
> should be one, or how this can fix anything, unless ATCT monkeypatches
> Zope 2 BaseRequest and puts that response in there. And if it it does
> *nothing* that has __bobo_traverse__ would work, so I doubt that.
> 
> In short: It's a bug in ATCT (whatever that is).

Exactly, it's a bug. And it's even one that I've already filed for the
plone.org collector, including a patch: http://plone.org/collector/4709

Please! Let's not dilute Zope 2 APIs even further. AT sets a bad, bad
example here. I don't want it to spread just because AT has a large user
base or so. Please fix AT.

Philipp