[z3-five] Re: Five 1.1b: i18n for forms
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Tue Jul 26 03:32:39 CEST 2005
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>> As for the Zope X3-3.0.0-Zope-2.8 branch, I don't know what happened
>>> there and what the changes compared to the Zope-X3-3.0.0 tag are. I
>>> wasn't there when the branch was created and I actually think it's a bad
>>> idea to have done it anyway. It should have been a tag IMO.
>>
>>
>> It couldn't be: ZopeX3-3.0.0 was (trivially) incompatible with ZODB 3.4
>> (which added actual method signatures to interfaces asserted by code in
>> Zope).
>
>
> I guess you're talking about the changes to IDataManager which affects
> the MailDataManager:
>
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-checkins/2005-April/024613.html
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-checkins/2005-April/024669.html
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-checkins/2005-May/024993.html
>
> I propose to keep two separate MailDataManager implementations, one for
> ZODB 3.3 and one for ZODB 3.4.
I merged/integrated the ZopeX3-3.0.0-Zope-2.8 branch into the main X3.0
branch now; as for the data managers (mail and rdb) I've taken care so
that they will work with both ZODB 3.3 and 3.4 (for the mail data
manager I actually followed my above idea to have two separate ones).
If you want to follow my changes, read r37415 through r37425. I'm open
to suggestions if you see something that you don't like.
Yvo, Lennart and others: the branch is waiting for your bugfix backports
now. Just be sure to run the tests on both X3 standalone and a Zope 2.8
sandbox (I removed lib/python/zope from mine and symlinked it to
Zope-X3.0/src/zope).
I talked to Andreas and let him know about the X3.0.1 release. I will
tag it the same day he'll tag Zope 2.8.1beta, which means sometime on
Thursday. Please be ready by then; don't forget your entries to CHANGES.txt.
I haven't decided yet whether to do a X3.0.1beta on Thursday or just
make it a final. If we do the beta, we wouldn't necessarily have to
release it as a tarball; it could just exist in Zope 2.8.1beta for the
time being. X3.0.1 final would then be released as a tarball, together
with Zope 2.8.1 final. What do you guys think?
Hmm, I wonder why we're having betas for minor releases anyway. Andreas
already dropped the practice for the 2.7 branch, I'm surprised he still
wants to do it for 2.8.
Philipp
More information about the z3-five
mailing list