[z3-five] Restructuring

[Martijn Faassen]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> 
>> I'm extremely OK with it, as i have long found the current structure a
>> hindrance.
>  
> I'm glad to see I'm not the only one... When we started Five we 
> explicitly avoided structure so it wouldn't get in our way. I think we 
> have the opposite case now, non-structure is getting in our way.

I disagree that we are dealing with a non-structure. So far I've seen 
proposals to turn modules into packages, basically, but what's the use 
of that except to add air?

Examples, please? How is the current structure of modules in a package 
getting into our way?

 > I don't think we should mimic the whole zope.app hierarchy, the
 > differences and needs of Five are just too great. But now that you've
 > suggested it, I *am* strongly considering Five.form! :)

If we can indeed figure out what should belong in it, why don't we make 
a module out of this? I'm not against module restructuring, just really 
wary of introducing new packages. I don't believe Five is big or 
decoupled enough to warrant packages.

Regards,

Martijn