[z3-five] Re: Security and Five

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Martijn Faassen wrote:

> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> 
>> | Well, we're currently mixing in the zope: and the browser: namespace 
>> in | five:. Maybe we should create a five-browser:?
>>
>> +1 on that.
>>
> 
> I'm actually going to use 'browser' and 'zope', and reserve 'five' for 
> directives that really do not exist in Zope 3.
> 
> This means that our directives need to implement proper subsets of the 
> ones in Zope 3; that is, on the directives that we support, as much as 
> possible we use the exact same schema as in Zope 3, but we ignore 
> anything in ZCML that we cannot handle on the directives in Five.

+1

This actually does not only mean that we have to use the schemas as much 
as possible; it really means that we have to the exact same schemas; and 
i mean object identity here, not equality :)

Philipp