[pypy-dev] Work plan for PyPy
Antonio Cuni
anto.cuni at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 01:06:24 CEST 2007
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
> * What we do with ootypesystem backends and external functions? Right
> now this is implemented by backends which tends to be a bit ugly
> implementation. My idea would be to have backend-sensitive
> implementations which access backend-specific RPython functions for
> accessing underlaying platform classes/functions/whatever.
I agree. Supporting external functions directly in the backend is
easier, but now that gencli can call .NET code we don't need those
functions to be external anymore, we can just provide a real
implementation for them.
The problem is that at the moment genjvm can't call java functions, so
this solution would not work for it.
ciao Anto
More information about the pypy-dev
mailing list