[lxml-dev] lxml 2.2 validation question

[James Slagle]

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote:
> That said, was there actually a reason why you defined the namespace
> prefix in the first place? Why isn't the default namespace enough to do
> what you want? (Note that the prefix used in the schema is independent of
> the one used in the document, that's what I meant with prefixes being
> 'overrated'.)

There was no good reason.  I was merely trying to match the example
xml that I have for working with this particular tool.

Thanks for the helpful information, it has certainly helped clear
things up for me.

--
-- James Slagle
--