[lxml-dev] Handling namespaces in tags
jholg at gmx.de
jholg at gmx.de
Fri Oct 24 10:43:31 CEST 2008
+1 for a utility function that returns a (ns, local-name)-tuple.
From an lxml.objectify-perspective, objectify stays easier to use if the
number of element methods
remains "small" due to the fact that method and sub-element access use the
same syntax.
A pure python utility implementation would be instantly usable on
ElementTree, too, wouldn' it?
I for one do not like the smart string stuff too much. Doesn't this
undermine ElementTree compatibility?
This is different for xpath, which ElementTree doesn't really support.
I'll admit this is gut-feeling comment, though.
Holger
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://codespeak.net/pipermail/lxml-dev/attachments/20081024/952683ff/attachment.htm
More information about the lxml-dev
mailing list