[lxml-dev] lxml Mac installation idea
Guntsche Michael
mike at it-loops.com
Tue Nov 11 19:12:03 CET 2008
On Nov 11, 2008, at 18:52, Mark Bestley wrote:
>
> I made an attempt to do a Mac OSX build and I think I can answer
> some of
> the questions raised in the various threads. I can't come up with a
> good
> general soultion.
> The easiest seems to me to use macports for all the C dependencies and
> things seem to just work as they do for Michael Guntsche.
I had tossed around several E-Mails with Paul Everitt today to take a
closer look at the iconv issue but you beat me to it, thanks. :)
As for the static build, my feeling is that the majority of the issues
here steam from the fact that while the python app is universal the
self-compiled libraries are often i386 only. I had my shares of
problems with this before so I compiled every related library as
universal and now I no longer have problems.
Some possible solutions I can add:
* use macports to compile everything as Universal Binary
* Explain in the README how to do this yourself, or provide a script
etc.
I do not really like the idea of static builds, since the static
library has to be universal as well which means bigger files.
Kind regards,
Michael
More information about the lxml-dev
mailing list