[lxml-dev] pyquery
Olivier Lauzanne
olauzanne at gmail.com
Sun Dec 14 23:04:03 CET 2008
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Olivier Lauzanne wrote:
> > I have implemented some of the classes that are present in jQuery but not
> in
> > the css standard. Extending the classes seems like the right way to do
> it.
> > You can check it out here.
> >
> >
> http://www.bitbucket.org/olauzanne/pyquery/src/tip/pyquery/cssselectpatch.py
> >
> > cssselect should remain standard compliant but I could make a patch so
> that
> > using the jQuery pseudo classes is an option of the CSSSelector class. I
> > don't have a strong opinion about doing it or not doing it. What do you
> > think ?
>
> Would it make sense to make this a separate module like "jqselect" (which
> would inherit most of the API of cssselect) instead of patching into
> cssselect itself?
>
> Stefan
>
> It's possible but not simple. I would have to add a parameter on most
functions down to parse_simple_selector for it to use some specific Pseudo
and Function classes. Or else I would have to do some major refactoring :
putting most functions in a class and using self.Pseudo and self.Function
instead of Pseudo and Function. That would be the nicest I think.
Then the JQueryPseudo and JQueryFunction classes could be put in a different
file.
Anyway I have to patch cssselect if I don't want to duplicate code (which I
don't want), either with a monkey patch or by modifying cssselect. The most
simple is definitly monkey patching. But it's not the safest in the long
term.
Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://codespeak.net/pipermail/lxml-dev/attachments/20081214/aa1a8ec5/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the lxml-dev
mailing list