[lxml-dev] lhtml

Ian Bicking ianb at colorstudy.com
Thu May 24 18:42:30 CEST 2007


Ian Bicking wrote:
> I really want to take all our HTML-related routines and put them into a 
> proper package

And maybe a bit of advice -- we could just do this as a set of functions 
(what we currently have), or potentially explore objectify and add the 
routines as methods.  E.g., el.find_by_class('classname')

This feels like a cleaner API, but I'm worried that it will mean 
problems when mixing non-objectify-HTML with other elements, and if 
there's problems with threads or memory overhead, or any other issues. 
I don't really mind functions, which is why I am unsure; OTOH, almost 
every function has a first argument of "el", which makes them seem like 
methods.

-- 
Ian Bicking | ianb at colorstudy.com | http://blog.ianbicking.org
             | Write code, do good | http://topp.openplans.org/careers


More information about the lxml-dev mailing list