[lxml-dev] feedback on XPath docs?

[jholg at gmx.de]

Hi,

> 
> http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/xpathxslt.html
> 
> Any comments?

I think it's well understandable.
I'd grant the getpath convenience its own paragraph + heading as it is a nice little goodie and does not seem especially related to XPath return values ("A related convenience method of ElementTree objects is getpath(element),[...]")
Suggestion: "XPath expression generation for Elements"

If interesting stuff is missing I wouldn't know as the documentation now covers more than what I've ever used of lxml XPath capabilities.

Holger
-- 
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail