[lxml-dev] atom model

[Martijn Faassen]

Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> Ian Bicking wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> That way, we'd have "lxml.ns.html" and "lxml.ns.atom" and hopefully
>>> others in the future.
> 
> like lxml.ns.svg, for example.
> 
> 
>> I'm not a fan of deep hierarchies myself; lxml.html and lxml.atom seem
>> self-explanatory to me.  Maybe with more obscure formats it would be
>> less so.
> 
> I don't know, we'll see. We can just postpone that decision to 2.0 alpha.

A vote for flatter hierarchies here.

Regards,

Martijn