[Lxml-checkins] r42846 - lxml/trunk/doc
scoder at codespeak.net
scoder at codespeak.net
Tue May 8 13:43:59 CEST 2007
Author: scoder
Date: Tue May 8 13:43:58 2007
New Revision: 42846
Modified:
lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt
Log:
numpy
Modified: lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt
==============================================================================
--- lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt (original)
+++ lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt Tue May 8 13:43:58 2007
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
is: the more of your code runs in Python, the less you can benefit from the
speed of lxml and libxml2. Note, however, that this is true for most
performance critical Python applications. No one would implement complex
-matrix calculations in pure Python when you can use Numeric.
+matrix calculations in pure Python when you can use NumPy.
The up side then is that lxml provides powerful tools like tree iterators,
XPath and XSLT, that can handle complex operations at the speed of C. Their
More information about the lxml-checkins
mailing list