[Lxml-checkins] r42846 - lxml/trunk/doc

scoder at codespeak.net scoder at codespeak.net
Tue May 8 13:43:59 CEST 2007


Author: scoder
Date: Tue May  8 13:43:58 2007
New Revision: 42846

Modified:
   lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt
Log:
numpy

Modified: lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt
==============================================================================
--- lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt	(original)
+++ lxml/trunk/doc/performance.txt	Tue May  8 13:43:58 2007
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
 is: the more of your code runs in Python, the less you can benefit from the
 speed of lxml and libxml2.  Note, however, that this is true for most
 performance critical Python applications.  No one would implement complex
-matrix calculations in pure Python when you can use Numeric.
+matrix calculations in pure Python when you can use NumPy.
 
 The up side then is that lxml provides powerful tools like tree iterators,
 XPath and XSLT, that can handle complex operations at the speed of C.  Their


More information about the lxml-checkins mailing list