[Kss-devel] Superfluous view registration?

[Jeroen Vloothuis]

Balazs Ree wrote:
> This is, besides the unittest you mentioned, also completely tested in 
> all variations in the "error" demo and selenium test.
No it is not tested in the Selenium tests. That is what made me think 
this was a useless view (since kss.zope does not load it and all 
Selenium tests ran fine). The Selenium test in question has this code:

    @kssaction
    def errTest(self, id, act):

What happens is that the `kssaction` decorator itself catches exceptions 
and returns an entirely different body (normal KSS style). Here is a 
small snippet of that code (from actionwrapper.py).

        try:
            result = self.f(obj, *arg, **kw)
        except KSSExplicitError, exc:
            # Clear all the commands, and emit an error command
            obj.commands.clear()
            obj.commands.add('error', None, message=str(exc))

So it seems that at the very least we have lack in our tests. What I 
would like to know is when would this view be used if `kssaction` seems 
to do it's own thing?