[Kss-devel] KSS without Zope

[Jeroen Vloothuis]

Balazs Ree wrote:
> kss.support, more ok, actually for me this feels the best so far. Also 
> think that we may have more subpackages:
> 
> kss.support.commands
> kss.support.cookjs

Can those be shortend to kss.commands and kss.cookjs (or kss.jscooker).

> or whatever, so support is good because after that you say "support for 
> what".
> 
> yet another (not too bright) suggestion is kss.base .
>  
>> Jeroen, while doing the python stuff, could you pay attention to not 
>> introduce pylons only stuff except in a kss.pylons package ?
>  
> Definitely.

I would not dream of doing it any other way.

> And whoever creates a new package, make sure of the egg format.

This goed without saying :-)