[Kss-devel] move doc directory from egg trunk to package root?
Jeroen Vloothuis
jeroen.vloothuis at xs4all.nl
Sat Dec 8 01:16:45 CET 2007
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Jeroen Vloothuis wrote:
>> 1. do we need these headers at all?
> I think it makes sense to 1) recognize credit of the authors
Sure, but will people look into eggs for this?
> 2) to remind people which license comes with the code they receive/use.
This reminder is also there in the egg info (provided our setup.py has
the right stuff).
>> 2. can't we have a pointer license.txt or something which points to
>> the original archive with everything in it instead of moving
>> everything over?
> What do you mean by the original archive ?
Ok, lets skip this suggestion.
>> 3. most packages in the wild seem to have docs at the setup.py level
>> (perhaps you have some good examples to the contrary?). Why is KSS
>> different?
> This argument feels weak. Should we move to PHP and JQuery because
> most CMS in the wild are PHP and JQuery ?
Python people expect documentation to be in a certain place. Moving
everything just because of supposed recognition and a license file seems
strange to me. So far the only reason seems to be about the license and
authors files. Why not just move those two instead of the whole docs?
More information about the Kss-devel
mailing list