From regebro at gmail.com  Tue Dec 11 22:19:11 2007
From: regebro at gmail.com (Lennart Regebro)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:19:11 +0100
Subject: [icalendar-dev] iCalendar help
In-Reply-To: <8928d4e90712111304t1e7f8cf1q4297b0ffe172daf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D103CBD-444E-4C6F-A3F4-BB091C09BA70@ucl.ac.uk>
	<8928d4e90712111304t1e7f8cf1q4297b0ffe172daf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <319e029f0712111319t123aa067tfc55542a1517c086@mail.gmail.com>

On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> You should really be asking this on the iCalendar mailing list. You
> might not get an answer either,
> but you have a better chance than just asking me nonetheless.

Well your answer was correct any way! :-)

> I do know there is some interest in reviving the iCalendar project

It doens't need reviving, it just needs one or two bug fixes. Nothing
much happens with it, but that's because it's virtually bug-free. ;-)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64

From faassen at startifact.com  Tue Dec 11 22:22:17 2007
From: faassen at startifact.com (Martijn Faassen)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:22:17 +0100
Subject: [icalendar-dev] iCalendar help
In-Reply-To: <319e029f0712111319t123aa067tfc55542a1517c086@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D103CBD-444E-4C6F-A3F4-BB091C09BA70@ucl.ac.uk>
	<8928d4e90712111304t1e7f8cf1q4297b0ffe172daf@mail.gmail.com>
	<319e029f0712111319t123aa067tfc55542a1517c086@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8928d4e90712111322ycbfb44ia5676b50df321991@mail.gmail.com>

Hey,

On Dec 11, 2007 10:19 PM, Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> > You should really be asking this on the iCalendar mailing list. You
> > might not get an answer either,
> > but you have a better chance than just asking me nonetheless.
>
> Well your answer was correct any way! :-)
>
> > I do know there is some interest in reviving the iCalendar project
>
> It doens't need reviving, it just needs one or two bug fixes. Nothing
> much happens with it, but that's because it's virtually bug-free. ;-)

Yeah, I know. I'd be nice if CalCore would be maintained alongside it
I think though. That code does
some nice things and nobody knows about it. :)

Regards,

Martijn

From regebro at gmail.com  Tue Dec 11 23:11:12 2007
From: regebro at gmail.com (Lennart Regebro)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:11:12 +0100
Subject: [icalendar-dev] iCalendar help
In-Reply-To: <8928d4e90712111322ycbfb44ia5676b50df321991@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D103CBD-444E-4C6F-A3F4-BB091C09BA70@ucl.ac.uk>
	<8928d4e90712111304t1e7f8cf1q4297b0ffe172daf@mail.gmail.com>
	<319e029f0712111319t123aa067tfc55542a1517c086@mail.gmail.com>
	<8928d4e90712111322ycbfb44ia5676b50df321991@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <319e029f0712111411w8caf761pb1b544fbda70b69d@mail.gmail.com>

On Dec 11, 2007 10:22 PM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I know. I'd be nice if CalCore would be maintained alongside it
> I think though. That code does
> some nice things and nobody knows about it. :)

Well, in fact, my plan is to purify the Chronos views from Dateable
(who are based on CalZope views) and make the pure Zope3, and then
take CalCore and run these together under Zope3. It's still a rather
long way away though, but that's the plan... ;-)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64