[icalendar-dev] feature suggestion & patch

Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Wed Nov 29 14:41:06 CET 2006


On 11/28/06, Matt Chisholm <matt-icalendar at mosuki.com> wrote:
> Congratulations on the 1.1 / 1.2 releases.  I sent in this patch a
> while back, and I see that it hasn't been merged.  Did it get left out
> accidentally or on purpose?

Probably both. :)

> If you think it's not worth merging, that's fine with me.  It's not
> really that important.  :) I just wanted to make sure it didn't get
> left out accidentally.

Well, it's a feature, and I have only cared about bugfixes so far.
There may be more parameters that could benefit from closer and more
detailed parsing, we could take a look for that for a 2.0 version.
Also there is a TODO left in the TODO file, that is also related to
more detailed parsing if I understand correctly (although I don't
exactly know what it is that should be done).

What does MaxM think?

-- 
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo     http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management     http://www.nuxeo.org/


More information about the icalendar-dev mailing list