[icalendar-dev] feature suggestion & patch
Lennart Regebro
regebro at gmail.com
Wed Nov 29 14:41:06 CET 2006
On 11/28/06, Matt Chisholm <matt-icalendar at mosuki.com> wrote:
> Congratulations on the 1.1 / 1.2 releases. I sent in this patch a
> while back, and I see that it hasn't been merged. Did it get left out
> accidentally or on purpose?
Probably both. :)
> If you think it's not worth merging, that's fine with me. It's not
> really that important. :) I just wanted to make sure it didn't get
> left out accidentally.
Well, it's a feature, and I have only cared about bugfixes so far.
There may be more parameters that could benefit from closer and more
detailed parsing, we could take a look for that for a 2.0 version.
Also there is a TODO left in the TODO file, that is also related to
more detailed parsing if I understand correctly (although I don't
exactly know what it is that should be done).
What does MaxM think?
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/
More information about the icalendar-dev
mailing list