[Cython] 0.11.1 release timeframe?

[Robert Bradshaw]

On Mar 30, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

> Well, Robert, I you could add those changes we discussed in private
> mail for enabling Cython run from the ZIP file, I would be great...
> This can give anyone the freedom of easily "downgrade/upgrade" Cython
> just for the purpose of cythonizing some codebase that requires
> older/newer versions of Cython of the one installed in the system. The
> only issue that remains problem of handling "resource" files like
> these *.pxd in "Include/" ...

Sure. I pushed my changes to devel, and the pickling/unpickling stuff  
looks safe enough for me if you want to push it.

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>>>> and moving a lot of those tickets over to 0.11.2 ?
>>>>>> (as they are not regressions). We've also had the for loops  
>>>>>> update
>>>>>> which it would be nice to release sooner rather than later.
>>>>>
>>>>> My only hesitance about loops is that it changes (for the better)
>>>>> the
>>>>> semantics of some loops. Hopefully people haven't been relying on
>>>>> the
>>>>> old behavior, but is that too much for a 0.11.x release?  
>>>>> Granted, it
>>>>> would only affect people abusing wrong corner cases.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure either. We might think about moving the change to 0.12
>>> entirely, but I actually consider it a bug that gets fixed. The
>>> sooner, the
>>> better. Fixing it right in 0.11.1 would make that clear.
>>
>>
>> I consider it a bug too, the only hesitance is the philosophy that
>> any code that works with 0.11 should also work unchanged with 0.11.1.
>> Given that it's already in the devel branch, I'll move my changes
>> fixes there too. Is there anything else in -unstable that's deemed
>> stable enough to be released? Also, if there's anything inhttp://
>> trac.cython.org/cython_trac/milestone/0.11.1 that anyone thinks
>> should really go in this next release (if so, mark it as critical or
>> blocker).
>>
>> - Robert
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cython-dev mailing list
>> Cython-dev at codespeak.net
>> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lisandro Dalcín
> ---------------
> Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
> Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
> Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
> PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
> Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
> _______________________________________________
> Cython-dev mailing list
> Cython-dev at codespeak.net
> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev