[Cython] Sage 3.2.3 vs. cython 0.11-devel

[Michael Abshoff]

Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
>>
>> OK, I think it's because the ordering of #includes has been changed.
>> I'm responsible for this--fixed some things, but apparently broke
>> others. Well, at least I have somewhere to look now.
> 
> Sage now compiles, a ticket is up at http://trac.sagemath.org/ 
> sage_trac/ticket/4987
> 
> Not all doctests pass, but it looks like it's in pretty good shape.

And having thought about the minpoly() issue a little more it now very 
much reminds me of the issue we saw at SD8.5 when the new-coercion-merge 
build on sage.math exhibited a mysterious segfault that only I was able 
to reproduce. Another thing was a mysterious doctest segfault that at 
some point magically went away and also involved a call to minpoly() in 
libSingular in a codepath that could have never been taken.

> - Robert

Cheers,

Michael

> _______________________________________________
> Cython-dev mailing list
> Cython-dev at codespeak.net
> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
>