[Cython] Status for 0.11

[Stefan Behnel]

Hi,

Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> 
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> It could however simplify the four lines at the end of every  
>>> function in
>>> Cython-generated C code. Personally I prefer to have the testcases
>>> listed as "failed" when run from runtests.py (and even be able to  
>>> flag
>>> refcount errors as expected in doctests, if we ever need that), but I
>>> don't have a strong opinion either way.
> 
> If it prints stuff out, it will still be listed as failed, right?

Sure, she just needs to keep her mouth shut when all is ok, and burst stuff
into Python's stdout when things go wrong. That will make the doctests fail
for free. That way it's trivial to test for output in the doctests as well,
e.g. you could enforce a leak on purpose and expect the nanny's cry as output.

Stefan