[Cython] Fix for #196 (for loop bug)

[Magnus Lie Hetland]

On Feb 8, 2009, at 09:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:

>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I just realized, however, that we are not following Python semantics
>> for the empty loop:
>>
>> sage: i = "foo"
>> sage: for i in range(10, 0): pass
>> sage: print i
>> foo
>
> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/208

I could have a look.

-- 
Magnus Lie Hetland
http://hetland.org