[Cython] Any thoughts on a DEFINED keyword?

[Dag Sverre Seljebotn]

Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Chuck Blake wrote:
>>> This made my mind up: I do not think we should reinvent the wheel here.
>> This was just following up what Stefan seemed interested in.  It was just
>> an alternative to using the far simpler use case of DEFINED which was
>> merely if not DEFINED(foo) and bears little relation to C++ templates.
>> You do seem to understand that from below, but I wanted to mention it
>> more explicitly.
> 
> Yes, I was following up myself, I could have been more clear. For the 
> record, I'm still +0 on Chuck's proposal.
> 

Also, I think it is important at this stage for Cython that patches are 
accepted unless there are good reasons against it, i.e that without any 
-1 it gets applied. But that is just a personal opinion.

-- 
Dag Sverre